Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14273 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 23:15:10 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 23:15:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 28587 invoked by uid 10001); 30 Oct 2002 00:20:57 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Oct 2002 00:20:57 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 186fVw-0001QN-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:11:12 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.176] (helo=protactinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186fVw-0001QE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:11:12 +0000 Received: from host62-6-96-78.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([62.6.96.78] helo=main) by protactinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 186fVq-0006iz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:11:06 +0000 Message-ID: <001001c27fa0$78e71420$4e60063e@main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:08:21 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: sound cards...well amybe if..... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 X-Spam-Level: * Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Hi Alberto, we are all jumping on you for your over-enthusiasm........but it occurs to me that this is a 24bit card....than may be more significant. It has the potential to give the level of s/n we might need. Could not the dreaded aliasing be used to benificial effect, or am I missing some subtle point. It occurs to me that a 96ksps sampler will 'fold back' 136kHz to 40kHz....so if any anti-aliasing filter could be disabled (I think, where used, these are normally passive rather than active ?).....it might be possible to have a software 136kHz RX !! THERE is a CHALLENGE for you software gurus !! I will await my idea to be shot down in flames, before I conside buying one of CL new audigy units !! Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com