Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29192 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 17:56:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 17:56:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 97760 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 17:56:02 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 17:55:59 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BDS8d-000P4P-61 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:55:59 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BDS7g-0005J2-FF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:55:00 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BDS7f-0005It-SS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:54:59 +0100 Received: from mta6-svc.business.ntl.com ([62.253.164.46]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDS7d-0007Wm-1o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:54:57 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: l8p8y6 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.232.205]) by mta6-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040413175455.FJAB29238.mta6-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:54:55 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (l8p8y6) Message-ID: <000f01c42165$221791c0$cde8fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20040411053239.NYFR13120.web4-rme.xtra.co.nz@[127.0.0.1]> <007101c41f87$3ce0ada0$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <11050987609.20040411095712@73.ru> <009101c42003$f14afa30$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <005101c42029$2c83ce40$6bcc8351@rogersservices> <000701c4208d$1f6f9360$27d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <000d01c420b4$9e93b960$58937ad5@rogersservices> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:03:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: O copy of RN6BN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:35 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: O copy of RN6BN > > > > Try a similar antenna system and power as RN6BN and you might succeed. > > Except you are exceptionally lucky and the wind is in the right direction > a > > 40ft pole and a 100 ft or so of wire will not do the trick. > > RN6BN considering the distance difference was nearly as strong as you last > > night !!!!!!!!!! I have heard you stronger in the past. > > Dear Mal, LF Group, > > The fact that the ZL boys did not see my signals last night comes as no > surprise - in fact, because it was still daylight here, I had to use my > "daytime" antenna configuration, resulting in only about 400mW ERP. Whether > an extra 4dB to the 1W ERP limit would make a difference I don't know, but > this was not what I found interesting. I suppose one could put the > unsuccessful attempts at receiving ZL6QH in the past down to the fact that > there is virtually no darkness path to ZL from western Europe, whilst, for > RN6BN, being further east means an hour or two when the whole path is in > darkness. However, this would not really explain the negative results trying > to receive UA0LE in Europe, whilst excellent reception of Ed's signal was > had in ZL. With the big antenna Ed was using, we should have been able to > copy him, even if our signals were too weak for Ed to see. If one accepts > that propagation is via multiple reflections from the lower layers of the > ionosphere, it would seem that a huge number of hops would be required to > cover the distances involved. It seems as if some LF propagation paths work > much better than others; I would be interested to know why. > > I am currently (1730z) transmitting on 137.7035kHz again; RN6BN is "O" copy > on 137.7026kHz, to the nearest 0.1Hz I can see you both and you are only slightly stronger than RN6BN, who has been audible with me since 1600z broad daylight. I mean audible at S7 and getting stronger. Think of the distance difference!!!!!!! The reason WHY as you enquire, is a poor antenna, the old Decca on its own is not sufficient for the distance to ZL. In theory 1w erp from a match stick is the same as the same power from a large array but in reality there is a difference My choice is 1w erp from a big vertical. G3KEV > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >