Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9DE5B380000E4; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:18:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TvXY3-0002KD-UC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:17:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TvXY3-0002K4-DQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:17:15 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TvXY1-0007f9-SX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:17:14 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkGAN7X9lBcE7rk/2dsb2JhbABFpiIDj2iHcRdzghkUAQEDSQIsAggCAQcBHDkBBBoGJB0BAgIBAYgMmFqfY5E4A4gshVGYWIJ1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,480,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="415447995" Received: from host-92-19-186-228.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.19.186.228]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2013 18:16:52 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01cdf415$a672bbc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: "rsgb" Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:16:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF es MF Is there anyone able to QSO these days on either CW or QRSS on the 136 or 472 Khz bands, or where appropriate xband. I am not interested in BEACON 24/7 hoping for a HIT somewhere in the world.even though at this time of year propagation is optimum. I would prefer to go back to the past where QSO mode was the normal procedure and not QSL via internet. At present I would expect to be able to QSO with KL7 es YV if they were suitably equipped to Transmit on QRSS 30 - 60 I do not think anyone from the UK or EU has made a QSO on LF/MF in recent years across to North America or Russia on either CW or QRSS [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: LF: LF es MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01CDF415.A6135DB0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601850f6ef09396f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01CDF415.A6135DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LF es MF=20 Is there anyone able to QSO these days on either CW or QRSS on the 136 = or 472 Khz bands, or where appropriate xband. I am not interested in BEACON 24/7 hoping for a HIT somewhere in the = world.even though at this time of year propagation is optimum. I would prefer to go back to the past where QSO mode was the normal = procedure and not QSL via internet. At present I would expect to be able to QSO with KL7 es YV if they were = suitably equipped to Transmit on QRSS 30 - 60 I do not think anyone from the UK or EU has made a QSO on LF/MF in = recent years across to North America or Russia on either CW or QRSS De G3KEV =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01CDF415.A6135DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LF es MF
Is there anyone able to QSO these days on either = CW or=20 QRSS on the 136 or 472 Khz bands, or where appropriate = xband.
I am not interested in BEACON 24/7 hoping for a = HIT=20 somewhere in the world.even though at this time of year propagation is=20 optimum.
I would prefer to go back to the past where QSO = mode was=20 the normal procedure and not QSL via internet.
At present I would expect to be able to QSO with = KL7 es YV=20 if they were suitably equipped to Transmit on QRSS 30 - 60
I do not think anyone from the UK or = EU=20  has made a QSO on LF/MF in recent years across=20 to North America or Russia on either CW or = QRSS
 
De G3KEV
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01CDF415.A6135DB0--