Message-ID: <000e01c08f68$2f7a7860$0475883e@lvm>
From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: Gs seen in W4
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:38:06 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Many thanks Mike ,I was very thrilled to get the reports . Yes I was using
2:1 ratio to try to keep things as short as possible so as not to miss a
short opening.Now working on DFCW for same reason,and the eventual QSO of
course. ---Original Message-----
From: Mike Dennison <mike.dennison@rsgb.org.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 05 February 2001 10:39
Subject: LF: Gs seen in W4


Congratulations to Dex, Jim and Laurie for the first G-W on 136kHz.
I have just looked at Dex's spectrograms and these are so clear that
it looks like 10s dots would work fine. Using DFCW and 10s dots
would reduce the transmission time sufficient to exchange a
resonable amount of information before conditions worsen.

It looks like Laurie is using a 2:1 dash:dot ratio. Is this correct?

Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.lf.thersgb.net