Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4045 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2000 11:29:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 4 Jan 2000 11:29:06 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125S1Y-0004Te-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 11:21:12 +0000 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125S1X-0004TZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 11:21:11 +0000 Received: from [213.1.146.223] (helo=default) by rhenium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 125S1T-0001jC-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:21:08 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01bf56a5$6a829ac0$df9201d5@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: Latest report 137.0kHz signal Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:18:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all, I was unable to log s-meter readings of the 137kHz signal overnight but I have a trace from a long term log using FFTDSP4. The signal seems fairly steady and consistent up to about 0800z this morning. There is a noticable reduction in strength at 0835z, and by 0853z its noise sidebands had ceased to swamp a 100nV calibration signal injected at 136.780kHz. The signal faded completely at 0858z to return weakly at 0902z. It faded out again at 0924 and returned weakly at 0936z it then peaked weakly at about 1011z, was detectable at 1044 and had disappeared by 1058z. For comparison, using Geoclock the end of the dark night and the onset of morning twilight is shown as 0720z, and the main dawn at about 0800z. This kind of profile tends to suggest that the signal is indeed arriving from the west and may well be a fax transmission from CFH in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The increased perceived strength possible being a sum of rx aerial improvements at this end since the middle of the year and a new transmitter installation at CFH. What would be nice now would be to have the promised new software from ON5OO !! Just read this mornings posting before dispatching this....thanks for the confirmation Dave and Bob. Thanks for the comparison on strengths Dave....I have obviously improved my set-up. At least we may be able to monitor propagation conditions for a while. I suspect from what Jon has said it may only be being used whilst the more normal Fax transmitter is out of action. Cheers de Alan G3NYK JO02PB Alan.Melia@btinternet.com