X-GM-THRID: 1244964767556289635 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.25.11 with SMTP id 11cs473686wxy; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.190.2 with SMTP id n2mr3060458buf.1187290923626; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7si1180324nfh.2007.08.16.12.01.54; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ILkWb-0008Ju-0Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:56:53 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ILkWa-0008Jl-Ls for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:56:52 +0100 Received: from smtpout0177.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.177] helo=n082.sc1.he.tucows.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ILkWW-0003on-Pq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:56:52 +0100 Received: from g3kev (62.252.208.200) by n082.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4630CFCB008414EB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:56:41 +0000 Message-ID: <000d01c7e037$32422fd0$c8d0fc3e@g3kev> From: "hamilton mal" To: References: <000201c7e013$1a798340$0b01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:44:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: RE: 600 V 160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 331 John, Yes same erp. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Gould" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: LF: RE: 600 V 160 > Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP > (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute > measurement of the noise floor on each band. > > Incidentally, has anyone done some noise floor measurements on 136kHz now > that the Rugby LORAN has gone? > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > >