Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8029 invoked from network); 14 May 2003 10:56:32 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 14 May 2003 10:56:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 13209 invoked by uid 10001); 14 May 2003 10:49:52 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2003 10:49:52 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Ftob-00015C-6J for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 11:48:53 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.92] (helo=carbon.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19FtoV-00014z-QB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 11:48:47 +0100 Received: from host213-122-215-228.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.215.228] helo=Main) by carbon.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19FtoU-0002jX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 11:48:46 +0100 Message-ID: <000d01c31a06$439e9c60$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c319fb$49707ba0$6507a8c0@Main> <3EC21855.D16E9AA3@snet.net> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:45:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: CFH agn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.9 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Jay, that confirms to me that there was a very high level of absorption last night on the T/A path. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: Sent: 14 May 2003 11:20 Subject: Re: LF: CFH agn > Alan > > I can't tell you about last night but it appears to be full strength this > morning... > > Jay Rusgrove, W1VD > > Alan Melia wrote: > > > Hi all despite a definite "switch-off" at about 2400z on the 12th, I was > > sure I saw a weak FSK trace on ARGO at about 2320z last night (13th) My > > logger was started but the plot is wery weak. The line definitely seems to > > be above the noise, but at such low levels I cannot be sure that I was not > > measuring something else. > > > > Can any of the N.American stations confirm activity of CFH last night?? If > > this is confirmed, this is by far the lowest signal level received, and > > there is no history of them ever running a QRP mode. > > > > Thanks and Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > alan.melia@btinternet.com > >