Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1558 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 21:11:48 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 21:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28727 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 21:11:33 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 21:11:33 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19AFtZ-0001MD-A1 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:10:41 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.46] (helo=mta6-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19AFtU-0001M4-Bx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:10:36 +0100 Received: from ian ([62.252.205.206]) by mta6-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030428211035.VWTS22800.mta6-svc.business.ntl.com@ian> for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:10:35 +0100 Message-ID: <000d01c30dc2$7c758940$cecdfc3e@ian> From: "Ian Kyle" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030416120614.024e6ea0@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:11:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: BK amps. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0tests=REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jim, in your posting of 16 April on 'The Mystery....' you mentioned that the BK input circuitry could be modified to provide a bit more gain at 136. What needs changed to do this? 73, Ian