Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14778 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 12:21:41 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 12:21:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 26146 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 12:21:45 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 12:21:45 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18OdCE-0000yv-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:21:06 +0000 Received: from [209.225.8.21] (helo=dc-mx11.cluster1.charter.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18OdC8-0000ym-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:21:01 +0000 Received: from [66.189.48.230] (HELO johnupstairs) by dc-mx11.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with SMTP id 13695860 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:20:29 -0500 Message-ID: <000d01c2a690$2699a4a0$0200a8c0@charter.net> From: "John Andrews" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1a8.de39a4a.2b319c33@aol.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:22:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: M0BMU Jason Success! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0tests=REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Dave, >Not only the first Jason reception but also the first mode other than QRSS to cross the pond. < Uh... not so! I copied Jim in WOLF mode in March, 2001. Since I've also seen him in QRSS mode, this makes the third variety from his garden. However, it is the most significant, as tests with the Lowfers over here have shown WOLF to be similarly effective to QRSS60. Jason appears to be closer to QRSS10. >I'm sure all your hard work finding the right propagation and co-ordination between you will encourage those who hope that the path can one day be spanned with standard CW. < I think we're more than a few dB short. How important was your ability to accurately set frequency John? Is there an acceptable margin of error with Jason 95? Jason is very forgiving in that regard, as it works on the DIFFERENCE between the tones. An error of a few Hz would not be a problem. John Andrews, W1TAG