Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
Message-ID: <000c01c7e037$307add50$c8d0fc3e@g3kev>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev> <002001c7e015$d503f590$0e00000a@AGB>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:54:24 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Re: 600 V 160
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Graham.
my experience indicates it travels just as well as 500 during daytime.I can
work all around the UK and EU daytime.
73 Mal/G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:57 PM
Subject: LF: Re: 600 V 160


> Would have to  be at night, 1.8  wont travel that well during the day ?
>
> G ..
>
>
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
> To: "rsgb" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:53 PM
> Subject: LF: 600 V 160
>
>
> > Hi all
> > It would be interesting to try both bands at the same time over a given
> > path
> > to compare propagation.
> > I am using a 1/4 wave inv L on each band, both at the same height, and
can
> > run the same pwr if anyone else would like to try it.
> > This could be a useful experiment for OFCOM purposes to justify more RF
on
> > 600 metres.
> > 73 mal/g3kev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 - Release Date:
8/15/2007
> > 16:55
> >
> >
>
>
>