Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97517 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 09:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 09:41:34 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C6nT1-000Fzf-Vm for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:49:48 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C6nT1-000Fzc-SP for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:49:47 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1C6nL3-0002pT-Ie for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:41:33 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1C6nKT-0000al-GP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:40:57 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1C6nKT-0000ac-4O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:40:57 +0100 Received: from smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.138]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C6nKO-0007w8-RI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:40:57 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (Alan.Melia@213.122.10.96 with login) by smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 09:40:46 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01c49975$be2f22c0$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <41456DB9.29000.5F44F9@localhost> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:40:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 217.12.12.138 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of btinternet.com X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: CFH? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hi Mike, yes that is CFH, It has been active with occasional "offs" for about a week now, with this multiple sub-carrier type system. It looks from your pic as though there was data on the lowest "channel" last night. Previous nights and certainly when it first appeared here last night it was just the lines. I have a plot of last night, and whilst there was a lot of deep fading in the middle of the night the level reached an almost record peak of over 40dBuV here at one stage before dawn. The plot will be posted to my propagation page soon. I think out Trans-Atlantic friends are beginning to suffer from its "spread" like some stations suffer the effects of Lessay, Sylt and DCF39 in Europe. It does confirm that conditions are quite good at the moment and improving, but there is a cloud on the horizon as there was an M5 flare early yesterday. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk/latest.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" To: Sent: 13 September 2004 09:51 Subject: LF: CFH? > Last night at about 2330UTC, I heard an odd noise near > 137.0kHz at S9. It had faded out by this morning. I noticed > the same thing quite weak several morning ago at 0730, but > assumed it was was local noise. Was it CFH? If so, it was > alarmingly broad. > > See attached Argogram. > > Mike, G3XDV > ==========