Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19447 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 19:32:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2961 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 19:31:51 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 19:31:51 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19mer7-0000DV-LQ for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:30:53 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.147] (helo=einsteinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19mer3-0000DM-Iy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:30:49 +0100 Received: from host213-122-64-195.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.64.195] helo=Main) by einsteinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19mer2-00050U-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:30:48 +0100 Message-ID: <000c01c36108$3e28cdc0$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000e01c360e2$114c6300$6507a8c0@Main> <000701c360e6$157157c0$3704210a@Hugh> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:30:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Hugh, yes I supose it would have some effect. The advantage is that all the transmitters are under "atomic" control so there is almost a continuous phase difference between their carriers. The "mush" area, I think, refers mainly to the reception and demodulation of the AM program material. I suppose within ground-wave range there is "beat" when the strengths from Droitwich and say Westerglen are approximately the same ....the beat frequency would not more than 0.00001Hz or about 1 cycle in 30 hours (I hope my thumbnail calcuation is right....but I sure someone will tell me if it isn't). I dont expect that would give much problem but the path differences from the different tranmitters might give some interesting effects at distance. The only person I know who does monitor R4 is Laurence in Anchorage. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh M0WYE" To: Sent: 12 August 2003 16:21 Subject: LF: Re: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" > Hi Alan, Group, > Interesting article about BBC R4 LW. > > Does the fact that there are multiple transmitters on this frequency have > any bearing on those who might use the 198kHz signal as a propagation > indicator outside of the UK ? > > Presumably the interference pattern ("mush area") extends way beyond our > shores, and someone monitoring, say in the 'States might receive a weak > signal, not because there was no propagation, but because the two > transmitters happened to be in cancellation. > > I assume the signals that we might use for reference, such as DCF39, have > only one source. > > 73 > Hugh M0WYE > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Melia" > To: "LF-Group" > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:57 PM > Subject: LF: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" > > > > Hi All, I have posted the latest DTI Time & Frequency Club Newsletter to > my > > web site. It contains a short description of the frequency control of the > > BBC Radio 4 Longwave transmitters on 198kHz, together with details of the > > phase modulation data service it also carries on the carrier. This will be > > interesting information for those of you who, like me, may have a 198kHz > > off-air standard in your workshop. > > > > Download of the 68kB pdf file is available from the link in the contents > > section on the index page. > > http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk/ > > > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > alan.melia@btinternet.com > > > > > > > > > >