Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21483 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 23:13:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 23:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 19448 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2001 23:13:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Dec 2001 23:13:52 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16G6qc-0007qV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:07:02 +0000 Received: from chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.1.67]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16G6qb-0007qQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:07:01 +0000 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-13-112.easynet.co.uk [212.134.22.112]) by chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E6D31C5C5A for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:06:14 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <000c01c18750$04708160$701686d4@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001501c18685$c72752e0$1f9b883e@g3aqc> <001601c1868a$9d1b37a0$0300a8c0@charter.net> <000301c18695$d3c90420$0300a8c0@charter.net> <000401c18737$3449fe20$abe186d4@ericadodd> <004c01c18741$2d542dc0$09dc9384@ma.ultranet.com> Subject: LF: Re: Re: 73kHz propagation monitoring Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:09:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: John > It certainly could, providing that I get around to doing it on a regular > basis! Assuming that I am identifying the Rugby station properly, it > occupies about 100 Hz BW from 73.2 to 73.3 kHz. That sounds like it. It is rather wide and dirty if you live within 200miles of it. >I'll start paying more > attention to it. Unfortunately, I don't have a separate receiver to dedicate > to the task. Very few of us have!. I used a sort of slow manual time division multiplex with CFH and a wanted signal and switched to the wanted signal as and when. Some procedure for fast notification is necessary. With VE1JZ and VE1ZZ we used e-mail, telephone and HF radio. You could make a comparison say with Lauries signal and Rugby and see if they came up together. .I guess the process could be automated. Any of the LF gang got any suggestions? Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web