Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2000 18:33:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by redlabel.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 21 Mar 2000 18:33:54 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12XTMB-0002jo-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:26:19 +0000 Received: from hugo.fen.baynet.de ([194.95.193.10] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12XTM8-0002jj-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:26:16 +0000 Received: from 194.95.193.10.fen.baynet.de (dialin-nbg-151.fen.baynet.de [195.37.215.31]) by hugo.fen.baynet.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA19828 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:25:49 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <000c01bf7ea4$c69a4ac0$20d725c3@194.95.193.10.fen.baynet.de> From: "Walter Staubach" To: "Reflektor" Subject: LF: Congrats, Dave, 71.8KHz Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:53:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Dave, many thanks for my first X-band-QSO. I saw you very well, lost nothing, although the band was more noisy than in the morning. My output on 137.7 is only 65 watts. I am surprised how good signals on this low band are. Probably the range of the groundwave on 71 is better than on 137? Thanks again, Dave, and 73 de Walter, DJ2LF, JN59NO --------------------------------------------- Walter.Staubach@fen.baynet.de