Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 859BF38000095; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:14:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Scaei-00014J-82 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:13:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Scaeh-00014A-QP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:13:31 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Scaef-0001C3-Tu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:13:30 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsIJADKM0E9cF/pn/2dsb2JhbAArGol9qHEEgSqBCIITBQEBBAEIAQEDJQEjAg8XBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHdQkHKbhRix1Egi+DFQOIDYUwklmFAYJggVYF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,730,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="374644187" Received: from host-92-23-250-103.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.250.103]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 07 Jun 2012 12:13:28 +0100 Message-ID: <000b01cd449e$8ed026a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00ad01cd424c$0138a690$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00d301cd4255$b6428ac0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <636F5742-6949-4616-9CFD-3FCF99B4506A@gmail.com> <00f301cd4263$4ce62880$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FCCD78A.6030302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FD08634.8010402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:13:24 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan I have had QSO's on 500 Khz across the Atlantic also EI0CF many times during the winter months. I work QSO mode only and no beacons. I have also had some QSO'S with Russian stations, they call me on 7033 and I reply on 502 normally although I have vfo control. I work on CW and if condx get difficult I work QRS3 but not SLOWER When the new band starts the old 500 khz band will end next January Mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:451746400:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154fd08d123286 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan I have had QSO's on 500 Khz across the Atlantic also EI0CF many times during the winter months. I work QSO mode only and no beacons. I have also had some QSO'S with Russian stations, they call me on 7033 and I reply on 502 normally although I have vfo control. I work on CW and if condx get difficult I work QRS3 but not SLOWER When the new band starts the old 500 khz band will end next January Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 10:45 AM Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz > Hi Joe, LF, > > Yes, we're here of course :-) > Unfortunately i still cannot receive on MF. My RX is home made and vy > narrow band. But i'm going to have a suitable RX in some time. > BTW, what about all the 500 kHz allocations. What happens to them when > the new 475 kHz band becomes permitted? Will you have an extended > frequency range then or will you have to QSY? > And what about the chances of this band? How easy is a TA detection? > Would it be possible to have a CW QSO over that 4400 km distance? > It would be possible for me to radiate 1 kW ERP on that band, however > with a 1W (EIRP of course) limitation, this may become a problem... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 07.06.2012 02:15, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > > > > Hopefully someone will read this on Baa Baa.... > > > > The beacon is running on a new frequency with a CW ID and > > a 10 second carrier. Reports most welcomed. > > > > 73 > > Joe VO1NA > > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php > > >