Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20939 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 21:05:45 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by equinox-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.HARL.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2002 21:05:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 22435 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 21:05:28 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2002 21:05:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17FLQZ-0005Aw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 22:01:15 +0100 Received: from mta3.snet.net ([204.60.203.69]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17FLQY-0005Ar-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 22:01:14 +0100 Received: from cianciolo (97.79.252.64.snet.net [64.252.79.97]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-smtp-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with SMTP id g54KwfI5002187 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:58:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000b01c20c0b$86d3db80$6e01a8c0@cianciolo> From: "PC" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Who did the summer/winter noise comparsion? Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:05:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Folks, I have done some searching but cannot find the data. Some one, I believe on this reflector had done some long term noise testing on the LF freq. during a summer and a winter. I remember seeing the graphs nicely done on a webpage comparing time (days, months) to noise reading. This was done on a selective voltmeter to the best of my knowledge. Can anyone point me in the direction of that page? Or perhaps has info on the test? Thank you This data may also be avaiable in another form such as Terman or Reference dta for engineers but I would like to compare thqat with the collected data. Seems that this data would also be very geograhically dependent Thank you PaulC W1VLF