Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 142AA3800009E; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHER-0005M9-RX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:16:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbHER-0005M0-Am for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:16:59 +0100 Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.64]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbHEP-0003Ty-D1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:16:58 +0100 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Hvlg1j0041swQuc57wGvrS; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:16:55 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HwGu1j00L0CFS1j3bwGujB; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:16:55 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01cd41c5$d1e486b0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: , "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep" References: <006a01cd4196$3f0d52b0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <4FCB80CC.8050702@hifidelity.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:16:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Steve It's a personal thing that has to do with searching the internet for technical information. I find that as time goes on a larger percentage of search results are links to 'everyday' posts on lists that archive everything - often a yahoo group. Very few of these posts turn out to have information of value - most are little more than a passing chit chat that happens to fit the search terminology. As we go forward with ever more posts being archived by more and more 'groups' one can imagine even more search result 'pollution'. I'd rather not add to the 'clutter'. [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.64 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427301920:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410c4fcbc67c2028 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Steve It's a personal thing that has to do with searching the internet for technical information. I find that as time goes on a larger percentage of search results are links to 'everyday' posts on lists that archive everything - often a yahoo group. Very few of these posts turn out to have information of value - most are little more than a passing chit chat that happens to fit the search terminology. As we go forward with ever more posts being archived by more and more 'groups' one can imagine even more search result 'pollution'. I'd rather not add to the 'clutter'. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Dove" To: Cc: ; "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep" Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: Gettign rid of Black Sheep > Hi Jay, and Jim 'MBU, > > As two of the participants who make among the more informed and sensible contributions - and so > with value to others lying well beyond the ephemeral - I find your distaste for archiving a bit > non-plussing! > > Cheers, > > Steve > > > On 6/3/2012 2:36 PM, JRusgrove@comcast.net wrote: >> Some folks (me included) are not interested in having their >> messages archived for eternity ... or looking for a place to >> upload articles or pictures of a new gadget.