Return-Path: Received: from rly-de11.mx.aol.com (rly-de11.mail.aol.com [172.19.170.147]) by air-de04.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDE042-51749527478145; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:42:38 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-de11.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDE118-51749527478145; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:42:18 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LFXjm-0006hz-3s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:41:38 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LFXjl-0006hq-C9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:41:37 +0000 Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LFXjj-0003xO-Vi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:41:37 +0000 Received: from OMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v5Qs1a05H16LCl0525hVjy; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:41:29 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([65.96.107.144]) by OMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v5hV1a00136xPMd3S5hV4V; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:41:29 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01c965ee$da266160$6c01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <00ae01c965e5$9a2a4f30$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:41:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: LF: Re: wspr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C965C4.F1126600" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C965C4.F1126600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal I was transmitting with WSJT7 in WSPR mode last night. Haven't used it enoug= h to say if it is 'better or worse', however it is designed to be used in QS= O mode rather than beacon mode so there are a number of differences. If you're interested in looking, I can transmit QRSS3 on Friday night for a=20= bit. Jay ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:35 AM Subject: LF: wspr Has anyone tried WSJT 7.02 in WSPR mode and found it better than the wspr=20= 1.01version. Your experience ? mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C965C4.F1126600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mal

I was transmitting with WSJT7 in = WSPR=20 mode last night. Haven't used it enough to say if it is 'better or worse',=20 however it is designed to be used in QSO mode rather than beacon mode so the= re=20 are a number of differences.

If you're interested in looking, I can tran= smit=20 QRSS3 on Friday night for a bit.

Jay

----- Original Message -----

mal= =20 hamilton

To: rsgb

Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008=20= 11:35=20 AM

Subject: LF: wspr

Has anyone tried WSJT 7.02 in WSPR mode a= nd found=20 it better than the wspr 1.01version. Your experience ?
mal/g3kev

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C965C4.F1126600--