Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 26604 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2001 09:01:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 2001 09:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7001 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2001 09:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 23 Feb 2001 09:01:36 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14WDzM-0002FK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:54:08 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.138] (helo=ruthenium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14WDzJ-0002FF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:54:05 +0000 Received: from [62.7.90.107] (helo=dave) by ruthenium with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14WDz1-0004El-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:53:48 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01c09d76$2cecebc0$6b5a073e@dave> From: "Dave Sergeant" <dsergeant@btinternet.com> To: "rsgb_lf_group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> References: <200102211621_MC2-C65E-1ECB@compuserve.com> <006901c09d27$4612daa0$9b81fc3e@gi8ayz> Subject: LF: Re: Re: Reflector split?...please No. Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:52:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> >From Dave G3YMC Ian MI0AYZ wrote: >Besides, at the moment with a busted wing I cannot actually DO much until >the plaster comes Sorry to hear you have been in the wars, hope things are soon back to normal >It ain't broke so leave the dam'thing alone. I assume you mean the reflector and not your 'wing'... Yes perhaps splitting the reflector is not a good idea. The suggestion from Andre and myself seems to have generated more traffic than a split would have taken away! And for Andy Talbot I am certainly not an appliance operator, and most of us who use lf must build at least part of the station. I welcome any technical mails which help me in that process to operate normal cw - amplifiers, antennas, receivers etc. However the ones to do with dsp, wobble mode and six week qsos etc will still get deleted. Cheers Dave G3YMC dsergeant@btinternet.com dsergeant@iee.org http://www.btinternet.com/~dsergeant