Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27888 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 10:19:00 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 10:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7932 invoked by uid 10001); 11 Nov 2002 10:20:05 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 10:20:05 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18BBec-0005TI-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:18:50 +0000 Received: from [195.92.195.174] (helo=cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BBeb-0005T9-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:18:49 +0000 Received: from modem-122.louisiana.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.69.122] helo=f3a3a2) by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18BBea-0000p9-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:18:49 +0000 Message-ID: <000901c2896c$cee23640$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> From: "Laurie Mayhead" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:25:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re. DDH47 Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 X-Spam-Level: * Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group I also had a QSO with DDH47 cross band to 7025. I was very impressed by the "slick" operating proceedure. A typical QSO went as follows:- CQ DDH47 G3AQC K AQC 5NN 5NN LOC IO90NT QSL TU They then went on to the next contact. I know that we have an agreed proceedure for slow QRSS contacts,but is it as slick as this? We would not need the LOC info and 5NN etc would be replaced by O or M etc.,also the final QSL could be E E as at present. 73 Laurie.