Message-ID: <000901c06141$630f75e0$37da893e@default>
From: "MAL HAMILTON" <MAL@g3kev.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: Re: 73 khz permits
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:54:22 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: mike.dennison <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 07 December 2000 19:59
Subject: LF: Re: 73 khz permits


>G3KEV wrote:
>> the band was extended for a total of 3 years it was still the policy in
>> spite of the fact that all the existing permits holders that were active
>> were all south of Birmingham. For genuine experimental purposes this did
>not
>> make sense. Surely what was needed was a spread of experimenters covering
>> the North of England, Scotland and N. Ireland. But according to postings
>on
>> the reflector the rsgb did not contemplate any more permits.
>
>The decision not to issue any more permits was nothing at all to do with
the
>RSGB. It is ludicrous to suggest that the Society would work to
deliberately
>disadvantage any radio amateur.

Mike om
Your words NOT mine
You also surely must have heard of Government LEAKS
                                                             rsgb
LEAKS
                                                             GAS
LEAKS
                                                             WATER
LEAKS and Welsh Leeks
 On the contrary, the decision to start
>issuing the NoVs again was a direct result of representations by the
>Society. If you don't believe me, read the RA's Press Release on their web
>site.
>
>Mike, G3XDV
>
>
>