Message-ID: <000801c28721$7351b3c0$cc28730a@direcpc.com>
From: "lloyd chastant" <chastant@smart.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021107173202.00aab6f8@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <3DCB1DFA.6DFC618@att.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 07:22:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: HGB 75 KHz in North Carolina
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

I've done pretty much the same as Dex and have had similiar results..I
routinely look at 77.5 and 75.0 with Argo set at QRSS10 and see how those
are coming through..They seem to be copyable here fairly regular..In the
evenings I often check the AM frequencies-152,163,173(all approximately)and
have been hearing those lately , sometimes fairly nice..
de Lloyd W3NF Maryland FM19MH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <dmcintyre@att.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: LF: HGB 75 KHz in North Carolina


>
>
> James Moritz wrote:
> >
> > It might be worth stateside listeners monitoring levels of
> > government/utility signals near 73kHz, eg. the Rugby 73.25kHz FSK, HBG
time
> > signal on 75kHz, DCF77 time signal on 77.5kHz, to get a handle on
> > trans-atlantic conditions.
> >
>
>
> I monitored HGB some last season but never documented the results.  This
> was mainly due to antenna changes and the varying received signal
> strengths as the tunable preamp is tuned.  I think I need to dedicate an
> antenna just for this purpose in order to make meaningful reports.
>
> I recall trying to get enough signal for "radio clock" to sync on HBG
> but I don't recall ever being successful.  Tonight, and even before
> sunset, I have had enough signal for "radio clock" to decode and display
> the time.  I am presently receiving with a tuned, 3.3 meter, octagon
> loop and a balanced preamp.
>
> W4DEX