Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6290 invoked from network); 16 Nov 1999 22:35:25 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 16 Nov 1999 22:35:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 951 invoked from network); 16 Nov 1999 22:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Nov 1999 22:34:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11nqy3-0001LO-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:20:51 +0000 Received: from mail15.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.25]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11nqy2-0001LJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:20:50 +0000 Received: from modem-86.magnesium.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.5.214] helo=default) by mail15.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.03 #0) id 11nqxv-0006w0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:20:44 +0000 From: "Des Kostryca" To: "RSGB LF_Group" Subject: LF: Re:Simple Receivers For 136kHz Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:26:09 -0800 Message-ID: <000801bf30c4$a3d60a20$d605883e@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Mike Dennison wrote: >However, here's where the trap lies. I could hear >DCF39 at S9+ and >copied MM0ALM (650km) loud and clear. To a >beginner this might >indicate that all was well. But what I could not hear >was the Greek >RTTY which was S7 on the converter, the Loran or >any static. and.... >if you don't get a HUGE signal from DCF39 >compared to your noise level, and can't hear the >RTTY just below >136kHz most of the time, and can't hear Loran >and/or static all of the >time, you may need to increase the receiver system >gain. I most certainly fell in to this trap and actually reduced sensitivity of my system at one point thinking I would improve dynamic range. Oops! I have now corrected my error and have spent the past few weeks improving front end selectivity and sensitivity with positive results. I can now hear background noise, static crash etc and the RTTY signal at 136kHz. However, I have so far not heard Loran but to be honest I don't really know what Loran interference sounds like. So I wonder if someone could please describe for me the sound of Loran so I may identify the signal in future. Many thanks and regards to all on the list. Des. Des Kostryca (M0AYF) G.Q.R.P. no. 9788 I.A.R.U. loc. IO93OJ W.A.B. SK89 Member of the N.B.T.V.A.