Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EADF83800008E; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDzy5-0007NH-UI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:44:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDzy5-0007N8-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:44:09 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDzy3-0003hc-8n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:44:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvUUAG2VWFBcHn1c/2dsb2JhbABFijexAgKBA4EJghsFAQEEAQgBAQMlASMCJgYBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh2kKulSLG4FzG4FDgx8DjWWYH4Jm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,442,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="393904546" Received: from host-92-30-125-92.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.125.92]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 18 Sep 2012 16:44:06 +0100 Message-ID: <000701cd95b4$6bc8b520$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50589124.1040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:43:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Faster speeds are BEST not slower I am working on Fast Bursts of CW I will have been on the frequency made a contact and gone before you get started !! Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Cc: "Joe Taylor" ; "Edgar J Twining" Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:20 PM Subject: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.1 FSL_UA FSL_UA 2.6 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: LF: Re: WSPR tests by DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4082505896ef67d7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Faster speeds are BEST not slower I am working on Fast Bursts of CW I will have been on the frequency made a contact and gone before you get started !! Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Cc: "Joe Taylor" ; "Edgar J Twining" Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:20 PM Subject: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC > Dear LF group, > > A few days we started a discussion about a slower WSPR here in the > group. After that, i've been in contact with K1JT who meant he will work > out a slower WSPR version for LF, in a few months (hopefully). > > Markus/DF6NM kindly prepared a tool to generate different types of WSPR. > There are 3 versions. The first takes 2 minutes, i.e. the normal WSPR > that can be decoded with the normal WSPR software. Then there are slower > versions taking 8 and 32 minutes. > > We want to make some pre-tests to see the SNR improvement of a slower > WSPR, i.e. check if it will be confirmed by the SNR display that WSPR-8 > shows a 6 dB better SNR (12 dB SNR improvement for WSPR-32 respectively). > > Hopefully this will result in a new DX-mode on LF (Yes Mal, i know :-) ). > > So now i joined the WSPR group and start to do some test transmissions > with the normal 2 minute WSPR code, using Markus' tool. The goal is to > see if the tool works properly and what decode levels i can obtain in > various distances. > > A 2 minute WSPR beacon is running here in Heidelberg / JN49IK, 50% TX > time. I will run it until tomorrow 6 UTC. > > Reports apprechiated :-) > > Please can we try to move the LF reports/hour peak in the diagram above > the level of the 20m band? ;-) > > Tests using the 8 and 32 minute WSPR will follow soon. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: TX pwr may be a bit reduced in first tests, abt. - 10 dB f.s. >