X-GM-THRID: 1244946111515218924 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.25.11 with SMTP id 11cs455279wxy; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr2547277bue.1187273131639; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 33si896281nfu.2007.08.16.07.05.23; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ILfnG-00077q-4b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:46 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ILfnF-00077h-HU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:45 +0100 Received: from smtpout0129.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.129] helo=n064.sc1.he.tucows.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ILfnC-0006oA-5P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:45 +0100 Received: from g3kev (62.252.228.21) by n064.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 466CB1C8004EB239 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:53:33 +0000 Message-ID: <000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev> From: "hamilton mal" To: "rsgb" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:53:03 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: 600 V 160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 221 Hi all It would be interesting to try both bands at the same time over a given path to compare propagation. I am using a 1/4 wave inv L on each band, both at the same height, and can run the same pwr if anyone else would like to try it. This could be a useful experiment for OFCOM purposes to justify more RF on 600 metres. 73 mal/g3kev