Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56383 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 15:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 15:44:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 21763 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 15:44:27 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 15:44:25 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BD3bl-0005P7-1b for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:44:25 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BD3au-0003A7-VX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:43:32 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BD3au-00039y-Fv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:43:32 +0100 Received: from mta5-svc.business.ntl.com ([62.253.164.45]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BD3ar-0005Uf-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:43:29 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: l8p8y6 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.208.39]) by mta5-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040412154328.MRRP6228.mta5-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:43:28 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (l8p8y6) Message-ID: <000701c4208d$1f6f9360$27d0fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20040411053239.NYFR13120.web4-rme.xtra.co.nz@[127.0.0.1]> <007101c41f87$3ce0ada0$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <11050987609.20040411095712@73.ru> <009101c42003$f14afa30$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <005101c42029$2c83ce40$6bcc8351@rogersservices> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:52:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: Re: O copy of RN6BN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 1:57 AM Subject: LF: Re: O copy of RN6BN > Dear LF Group, > > Very good... looking at the map, this looks like it must be the new one-way > distance record. It is interesting that both UA0LE and RN6BN have put good > signals into ZL, but although the distance from western Europe to New > Zealand os not that much greater, no signals over that path seem to have > been copied, despite several attempts. Try a similar antenna system and power as RN6BN and you might succeed. Except you are exceptionally lucky and the wind is in the right direction a 40ft pole and a 100 ft or so of wire will not do the trick. RN6BN considering the distance difference was nearly as strong as you last night !!!!!!!!!! I have heard you stronger in the past. My 120 ft vertical is currently being used for dxing on 160 metres and not available for LF otherwise I might be in with a chance. If MM0ALM was about these days he also would stand a good chance of being seen/heard around UA0 and beyond possibley ZL. Distance between stations could be measured more accurately using GPS, conventional methods are subject to big errors and the signal path has to be determined more accurately, to much guesswork at present. G3KEV > > Thanks for the reports on my beacon signal - I transmitted from about 1650 > to 1920z on 137 703.5Hz. At the same time, I could see RN6BN in between my > characters - Sam's signal started quite weak, but by 1800 had risen rapidly > by about 20 - 30dB and was audible here for about 30 minutes. After that, > the noise level rose rapidly too, but RN6BN remained at "O" copy on the > spectrogram. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > >