Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18530 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 12:18:29 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 12:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16199 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 12:18:08 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 12:18:08 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18M5oA-0006yR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:17:46 +0000 Received: from [62.253.162.47] (helo=mta07-svc.ntlworld.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18M5oA-0006yI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:17:46 +0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([80.4.106.77]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021211121746.LUSY9037.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@oemcomputer> for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:17:46 +0000 Message-ID: <000601c2a10f$74a5cec0$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001301c2a102$f74fbdc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:18:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group G3AQC wrote: > I had tweaked the trimmer that tunes the xtal in the DFCW oscillator, in > order to avoid Mikes transmission. > This was a big mistake since the oscillator which has been stable for a year > or more started to drift up and down. > looks like I'm stuck at .401 Sorry to have inadvertantly caused a problem. My ERP is so tiny that I really didn't expect to achieve anything (though I have always attempted the 'impossible' in amateur radio and have sometimes been surprised by a success). I can transmit anywhere in 0.25Hz steps, so I will try to avoid 72.401 in future. In the meantime, I may be QRT for a while on 73kHz as my antenna current is now zero. Not yet investigated yet but the antenna works fine on receive, so I suspect that the FETs did not like 360s dashes! I really like the Argo screen shots posted by W4DEX and W1TAG. They provide almost real time feedback. Now I have an 'always on' connection to the web I may try posting my own screen when the rig is not in use. Mike, G3XDV http://www.lf.thersgb.net ====================