Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10880 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2000 17:29:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2000 17:29:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 26595 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2000 17:24:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 18 Dec 2000 17:24:23 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1483rR-00040h-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:14:05 +0000 Received: from cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.173]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1483rQ-00040W-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:14:04 +0000 Received: from modem-142.antimony.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.42.142] helo=default) by cmailg3.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 1483rE-0005id-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:13:53 +0000 Message-ID: <000601c06915$2e8b88a0$8e2a883e@default> From: "MAL HAMILTON" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: RE: other reports Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:06:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: -----Original Message----- From: Talbot Andrew To: 'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org' Date: 18 December 2000 09:16 Subject: LF: RE: other reports >Still the same power, but wet surroundings may make the antenna less >efficient. The load R has risen so looks valid. The BPSK message is >stored in PIC so won't change in the immediate future, I was soak >testing the PA and thought you'd prefer a message to a carrier. Keeps >within the spirit of the licence ID rules as well. > >May not persue the 2.5kW full bridge PA design. I had a couple of >rather frightening explosions yesterday that were a bit off-putting. >NEVER, EVER EVER use a make before break switch for hot switching >transformer taps Hot switching RF under any circumstances is risking device failure. I thought that was golden rule number one.!!!!!!!! While make before break helps it is better to switch off, make the tap adjustment and then turn it back on again. I use this procedure when adjusting my PA power levels and so far have never blown any FETS !!!!!!!!! It pays to be careful. Regarding super ac/bridge amplifiers. I know a man using that procedure and he can light up a 3kw electric fire as a dummy load. He is winding a new loading coil for the antenna using copper microbore tubing. Monitoring on a scope reveals a nice square wave into the electric fire but when connected to a 50 ohm dummy load the wave goes triangular. Expect there is an impedence mismatch/loading problem but the device is still in the experimental stage and no doubt will be rectified. These amplifiers need a man with a steady hand and a stout heart. It is important when testing to get behind a screen to protect yourself from flying debris if there is a bang. The electric fire DL versus the carbon resistor 50 ohm load is the opposite to what one would expect. The electric fire wire would element characteristics need investigating. The man says going beyond the 3kw o/p level causes too much voltage sag and almost puts the house in darkness. Expect he really needs a 3 phase supply. , I hadn't spotted it was Mb4B. That's the trouble >with having a very extensive junk box - don't tend to look at components >carefully enough. >But the present half bridge design will upgrade to 800W reliably with >IRF462 devices -cheaper than IRF450. Still need a very fast acting OP >short circuit protection circuit. > >Andy G4JNT > > >> Also Andy is on testing again at 13.00 but the same old >> message - could send >> out some sort of lowfer news for those without E-mail. You >> are S8 with me >> Andy, but not sure whether full power, sounded louder when I >> first heard >> you, but then went off before I could look at the S meter. >> John, G4CNN >> Reading, IO91ML24 >> >> >> >> > > >-- >The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence >is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). >For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, >or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is >prohibited and may be unlawful. > >