Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4808 invoked from network); 21 Aug 1999 08:04:53 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 21 Aug 1999 08:04:53 +0100 Received: (qmail 29117 invoked from network); 21 Aug 1999 07:03:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 21 Aug 1999 07:03:04 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11I4qJ-0003Fe-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 07:41:31 +0100 Received: from mb06.swip.net ([193.12.122.210]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11I4qI-0003FZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 07:41:30 +0100 Received: from win95 (dialup41-4-45.swipnet.se [130.244.41.237]) by mb06.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA18680 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 08:41:27 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000601beeba0$859e6e80$ed29f482@win95.swipnet.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: "RSGB LF group" Subject: LF: Multiple tuned vertical Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 08:43:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: I would like to hear if anyone have tested the Multiple Tuned Vertical in some form. I have understood that the antenna transforms the feed impedance with a factor equal to the square of the number of wires used. E.g.10 wires would raise the feed impedance about 100 times. I'm just rebuilding my LF-station and this antenna looks very interesting. However, not much information has been found in my litterature. Links or articles would be much appreciated. 73, Christer / sm6pxj