Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93545 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 11:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 11:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 83750 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 11:22:53 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 11:22:51 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BCzWd-000LfO-Qc for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:22:51 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BCzVf-0005PV-2a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:21:51 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BCzVe-0005PM-Fh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:21:50 +0100 Received: from smtp.wp.pl ([212.77.101.160]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BCzVb-0005Bm-Ln for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:21:47 +0100 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 25716 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 13:21:16 +0200 Received: from br198.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO sq5bpm) (sq5bpm@[80.53.201.198]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (wp-smtpd) with SMTP for ; 12 Apr 2004 13:21:16 +0200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (men.edu.pl) Message-ID: <000501c42080$45764ca0$6300a8c0@men.edu.pl> From: "Marek SQ5BPM" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:21:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiVirus: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. [wersja 2.0c] X-WP-AntySpam-Rezultat: NIE-SPAM X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: LF: Re: O copy of RN6BN etc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Hello everyone, > Bob ZL2CA and Sam RN6BN, PSE inform us > abt yours RX - TX setups under this beautiful > receptions. Especially RN6BN, please provide some info about the TX output power, antenna current, antenna height/length, expected ERP etc. It is "only" ca. 1200km farther from SP5ZCC than from RN6BN to New Zealand. Seeing such a good copy of a signal from UA, I am nearly sure that the same or comparable transmitting equipment would give at least a trace in Argo in ZL. I still remember that previous attempts from Western Europe have failed, then "the border" must be somewhere in-between. SP5ZCC seems to be more or less in the middle between RN6BN location and the UK: SP5ZCC <> RN6BN = ca. 1514km SP5ZCC <> M0BMU = ca. 1467km RN6BN <> ZL2OL = ca. 16438km SP5ZCC <> ZL2OL = ca. 17672km M0BMU <> ZL2OL = ca. 18790km Looking at the globe, the shortest path changes quickly and gets more and more over land when moving into the north-west of Europe... But, surprisingly, the path from Greece, southern Spain and Portugal to New Zealand is ca. 3/4 over the sea. Especially Portugal is interesting as the path is very close to 20000km and is mostly over the sea in both directions. Shortest paths on a sphere are not very intuitive hi. Congratulations to RN6BN and ZL2OL, I think we're all waiting for a successful reception of ZL signal in UA! === I have to take some holidays from work and raise the level of my poor setup at ZCC by a few steps :) I am currently finishing a 1m^2 receiving loop - during last activity in January I've been only copying the strongest stations... We have a problem at ZCC as our FT-990's reference oscillator stability degraded heavily with no reason - hard to work even normal CW as it happens to jump by 300-400 Hz (with no change on the display) and then slowly gets back to the original QRG. Strange - I suspect the reference quartz is broken and I am considering buying the TCXO-2. But first we let someone with better mesuring equipment to have a look at it. Do you think the master reference or rather the synthesis circuit is broken? Did anyone have a similar problem? Anyway - until this is solved I am not able to work any QRSS as it used to be the signal source and receiver for LF :( 73! Marek SQ5BPM