Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:17:13 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore02.plus.net ([192.168.71.3]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQmPh-0007EG-Iy for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:17:13 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQmUG-000Hqy-TC for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:21:56 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.72] (helo=pih-mxcore06.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQmUG-000Hqq-Ks for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:21:56 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQmPg-0002QI-Hy for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:17:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DQmPT-0004TC-1a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:16:59 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DQmPS-0004T3-Fu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:16:58 +0100 Received: from smtpout04-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.199]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQmPN-0006Lk-TE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:16:58 +0100 Received: (qmail 24415 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2005 13:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34) by smtpout04-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.199) with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2005 13:16:51 -0000 Message-ID: <000401c54b2c$f8d0e0d0$4d01a8c0@JKA> From: "John Andrews" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:28:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.202.165.199 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of w1tag.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Dave, > I'm willing to give it a try. > What frequency would be good for you? The 137.441 kHz frequency has generally worked well on both sides, though I chose it more for EU than North American reasons. 137.422 kHz is clear of Loran-C over a lot of the U.S., and might be the best choice for a TA experiment. John Andrews