Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10768 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2005 10:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2005 10:32:31 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CsezC-0004tP-MF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:28:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CsezB-0004sv-Lx for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:28:49 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Csf2j-0009Sj-A4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:32:29 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Csf0Z-0006Ix-3U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:15 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Csf0Y-0006Io-PQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:14 +0000 Received: from smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.10]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Csf0W-00043h-GS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:14 +0000 Received: from tnt-5-189.easynet.co.uk ([195.40.200.189] helo=erica) by smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1Csf0D-00034s-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:29:53 +0000 Message-ID: <000401c4ffb2$970eaf00$bdc828c3@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <41EA3B2E.152.BF48D9@localhost> <000401c4fb13$98ef8180$f8ce28c3@erica> <002201c4fc18$3c0fce60$01bc0150@captbrian> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:12:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.135.6.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ukonline.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=0.302 Subject: LF: Re: SWR-off topic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) I would like to thank all of you who sent me information, through this reflector and direct, regarding the history of the use of SWR as a method of measuring antenna/transmission line mismatch. I will be replying in detail to those who contacted me through direct e-mail. Peter, G3LDO