Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3424 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2003 11:59:24 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 11:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 7650 invoked by uid 10001); 13 Jul 2003 11:59:24 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 11:59:23 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19bfV7-00040q-Ne for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:58:45 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.111] (helo=gadolinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19bfV3-00040h-48 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:58:41 +0100 Received: from host213-122-122-148.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.122.148] helo=Main) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19bfV2-00024l-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:58:40 +0100 Message-ID: <000401c34936$1c4436c0$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000601c3491b$e54eb0b0$1d00a8c0@dellboy> <001101c34913$156bd2e0$6507a8c0@Main> <5.2.0.9.2.20030713114302.00b3f340@pop.vianw.pt> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:58:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: Re: T/A Condx 12/13th July Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Brian it is quite interesting you still have a copy which is only a dB or two below "O" when the path is so far down. It gives an idea of how much margin there is. I would have predicted 3 sec dots should just have been possible on the "good" night. I note your CFH plot is very similar to mine and depressed by about the same amount. Both paths seem to have correlated well with that although the DCF39 path is more difficult to interpret for T/A signals. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Rogerson" To: Sent: 13 July 2003 11:47 Subject: Re: LF: Re: T/A Condx 12/13th July > The "comparison" mentioned below is now on: > > http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian/Current_Captures.htm > > 73, Brian CT1DRP >