Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4927 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2000 18:23:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2000 18:23:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9945 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2000 18:26:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 24 Dec 2000 18:26:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14AFlT-0007v0-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 18:20:59 +0000 Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.42]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14AFlR-0007uv-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 18:20:58 +0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([213.104.100.183]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20001224182049.SUTQ23225.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@oemcomputer> for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 18:20:49 +0000 Message-ID: <000401c06dd6$25ae9040$b76468d5@oemcomputer> From: "mike.dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20001224.121800.-1123.3.riese-k3djc@juno.com> Subject: Re: LF: QRSS is a full success in USA Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 18:19:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: > this is a bit amusing. In the US the trend is to go for QRSS from BPSK > and in Europe from QRSS to BPSK. A kinda flip flop. > Bob K3DJC Not strictly correct. Almost all of those who are getting equipped for BPSK can already do QRSS. The whole point being that it is so simple to implement with existing freeware and internal hardware. There is only a tiny number of well-equipped Eu stations who have BPSK going efficiently. Merry Christmas de Mike, G3XDV