Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15346 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2000 18:06:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 14 Jan 2000 18:06:36 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 129Amv-0008Oc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:45:29 +0000 Received: from mb09.swip.net ([193.12.122.212]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 129Amt-0008OX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:45:27 +0000 Received: from win95 (d212-151-93-175.swipnet.se [212.151.93.175]) by mb09.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA08188 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 18:44:59 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <000401bf5eb7$87adbe80$af5d97d4@win95.swipnet.se> From: "Christer Andersson" To: "RSGB LF group" Subject: LF: 35 km band Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 18:47:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Lowfers, Today I received permission from the authorities to transmit between 7-8,5 kHz with maximum 1kW out from the transmitter. "The transmitter shall be designed according to the regulations in ITU RR App. S2 and S3." Q: Is a vertical to prefer, even though it becomes very short in terms of wavelength? Will the neighbours complain about mechanical resonances in the antenna at transmit? What would be the theoretical/estimated range? 73 Christer sm6pxj