Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15543 invoked from network); 12 Aug 1999 01:18:59 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 1999 01:18:59 +0100 Received: (qmail 19084 invoked from network); 12 Aug 1999 00:19:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 12 Aug 1999 00:19:49 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11EiKr-0004Se-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 01:03:09 +0100 Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.48]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11EiKq-0004SW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 01:03:08 +0100 Received: from v3q4v1 (dc2-isdn1730.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.154.194]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA10631 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:03:07 +0200 (CEST) From: "M. Sanders" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Eclipse - Effect on 75kHz... Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:00:29 +0200 Message-ID: <000401bee455$b0959a20$61976dc2@v3q4v1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <199908111428_MC2-809A-4DFE@compuserve.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Hi All, During the eclipse I have monitored HBG75 with the UBA ON5OO software and recorded more or less the same anomality. Mike, G3XDV was so kind to send me his measurement files and i have combined our measurements in one graph. There are still some unceirtenties that need to be cleared but the phenomena is fascinating! I would like to receive more data from HBG75 observations preferably in a ON5OO format from 11/8/1999 between 09:00utc and 12:00 utc. DK8KW wrote: > also here I measured an interesting anomaly in field strength of HBG75, > from here south of the moon shadow path. > > Why are there two maxima? I think analysing and comparing the data from multiple measurements may help us when we attempt to explain this complex phenomena. Best 73's Michael Sanders Mailto:pa3bsh@amsat.org