Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19279 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 22:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 17 May 2001 22:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 28223 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 22:21:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 17 May 2001 22:21:15 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 150W4w-0005fw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 23:17:06 +0100 Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.111]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 150W4t-0005fr-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 23:17:03 +0100 Received: from [213.122.252.99] (helo=default) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 150W4L-0004fk-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 23:16:30 +0100 Message-ID: <000301c0df1e$6f4241c0$63fc7ad5@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Subject: LF: re LUF Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:28:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Peter, as far as I understand it, the LUF is a function of the absorption in the D-layer and the noise level at the receive site. It is all complicated by the fact that the level of absorption is frequency dependent even in quiet periods. The prediction programs regard the LUF as a function of the ionising radiation reaching the D (and possibly E ) layer, so it is highest at local noon, and will change with the solar cycle. This is all complicated at LF and VLF because the absorption increase as the frquency increases. There is a parameter called the gyro frequency (a rotational frequency dependent on the energy of the ionospheric electrons and the earths magnetic field) which may determine the level of the LUF (My reading in this area is a little sparce and I only just starting to try to understand this factor). In periods of intense ionisation, we get 'reflection' rather than absorption, at LF and VLF, at the D-layer boundary and we see CFH, for instance, a few hours either side of 1200z. I believe the 2MHz lowering for a 10dB increase in power is just a figure that comes from the received noise densities at various frequencies. It effectivey says "some of your power is going to heat up the ionosphere so you will need more to reach your target range". I think a parameter is measured by the sounders from which LUF can be inferred. Geomagnetic disturbances upset this of course. We know how the LF bands (really should be called MF bands now 160-80-40m) often 'go out' at the time of an aurora. There is a little data in the "New Shortwave Propagation Handbook" published by CQ Communications (available from the RSGB bookstall ....plug over) But like all amateur publications there seems to be little said about frequencies below 2MHz. Cheers de Alan G3NYK Alan.Melia@btinternet.com