Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18069 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 10:24:58 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 10:24:58 +0100 Received: (qmail 7747 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1999 09:24:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Oct 1999 09:24:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Z9Cx-0002Y4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Oct 1999 09:47:27 +0100 Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.111] helo=gadolinium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Z9Cw-0002Xz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Oct 1999 09:47:26 +0100 Received: from [212.140.24.114] (helo=default) by gadolinium with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11Z9Cr-0001Fw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: <000301bf109f$ea7bf560$72188cd4@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: 73kHz Thurs 7th Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:41:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Peter, Mike, and Roger. Strange this morning....2 signals appeared on the screen almost simulataneously at a reading of 71.703kHz. It took a few minutes to realise that these were separate signals, but the stronger one with me drifted a few Hz hf. The weaker signal, steady on 71.703, had all the signs of being Mike (same frequency and about the same strength as yesterday) transmitting normal speed morse. I wonder whether the stronger signal was Roger, (or Peter). Both transmission ceased at almost the same time (0714z and a bit) The stronger one did not reappear, but the weaker steady signal reappeared at 0720 (or was it 0726? Ambiguity due to poor logging and a computer clocks running about 6 mins slow) and ceased at 0732 with a short burst at 0738. The last period has the signs of being a 'final over' so I assume Mike completed a qso with Peter. I only just copy Mike on spectrogram at maximum resolution, I had no sign of Peter's transmissions between Mike's overs. Although the stronger early transmission beginning at 0700z did show on FFTDSP4 it was just too weak to hear audibly. My inadequate aerial is well known so the strengths received are not signficant, better could be achieved with more application, as some of my school reports said. I had a weak sweeping mains buzz, which could be heard in the speaker but which did not seem to disrupt spectrogram too much. The aerial that just about works at 136 is showing its weakness at the more difficult lower frequency. Thanks for providing something to listen to on 73, its been a bit barren for me up to now. 73 de Alan G3NYK Alan.Melia@btinternet.com