Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56840 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2004 11:06:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Apr 2004 11:06:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 37525 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2004 11:06:18 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Apr 2004 11:06:16 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BBtpw-0009cw-Ma for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:06:16 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BBtp5-0001cV-QI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:05:23 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BBtp5-0001cM-4A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:05:23 +0100 Received: from mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.144]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBtp1-0005r0-F5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:05:19 +0100 Received: from web3-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.186]) by mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20040409110446.DAJJ4338.mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz@web3-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:04:46 +1200 X-Fake-Domain: mcalevey Received: from mcalevey ([210.55.37.199]) by web3-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20040409110445.MGXZ3175.web3-rme.xtra.co.nz@mcalevey> for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:04:45 +1200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (mcalevey) Message-ID: <000201c41e22$77dc63b0$c72537d2@mcalevey> From: "McAlevey" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c41e1b$cfebbda0$6507a8c0@Main> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:04:04 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: DCF39 in ZL again Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Alan, yes, it appears very likely that DCF39 is reaching us. As far as I can ascertain the first traces appeared when the gray line was about Moscow; maybe 2000km from Magdeburg? That 36dB advantage of DCF39 looks like a big hurdle to overcome. However the signal was very strong at the 60 second dot setting and also the keying sidebands were quite clear and there can't be much energy in those relative to the carrier. I will try the 20 second dot setting tonight. Bob ZL2CA will also be watching. Mike ZL4OL