Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29875 invoked from network); 20 May 2000 18:55:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 20 May 2000 18:55:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12tEJV-000408-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 May 2000 19:49:29 +0100 Received: from mail12.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.215]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12tEJU-000403-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 May 2000 19:49:28 +0100 Received: from modem-36.erchamion.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.195.36] helo=lvm) by mail12.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 12tEJS-0002Nt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 May 2000 19:49:27 +0100 Message-ID: <000201bfc28c$4a0f7440$24c3883e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Re.Puckeridge tests Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 19:49:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi Jim and all,

Thanks for all the hard work on the Ant tests.I confirm that the small Ant 5db better than the big one when grounded.Possibly 6db better when big Ant resonant.Very small difference I know but it does tend to prove that there was very little re-radiation from the big Ant.Will be intrested in reports from further away and other directions when you get them.Best wishes have a good weekend,will be listening.73s Laurie.