Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15220 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2000 22:10:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 10 Apr 2000 22:10:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12emHM-00038E-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:03:32 +0100 Received: from mail11.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.23]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12emHK-000389-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:03:31 +0100 Received: from modem-34.parrotfish.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.46.162] helo=lvm) by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 12emH7-0003My-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:03:18 +0100 Message-ID: <000201bfa338$acc8cc80$a22e893e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Re. Weekend Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:36:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi David,

Sorry I missed you at the weekend from Hastings,I didnt know what time you were operating,and I got rather busy with my new ant.

Re current I guess that it depends on wether its going into lossy ground or not,

presumably the cliff face was quite close to the ant.and if its porous rock chalk

etc.it might hold a lot of water.

So far reports indicate that my new ant. is putting out a better signal than the old one.So I will have to try to find a theory to fit the fact that less wire but more spread out results in lower ground loss

I look foreward to the Puckeridge experiments. are there any 136 stations close by?. I am still keen get some comparisons between high and low ants.

Best wishes, 73s Laurie.