Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23099 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2000 16:14:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Jan 2000 16:14:58 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125swB-0006jB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:05:27 +0000 Received: from mail1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.18]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 125sw9-0006j6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:05:26 +0000 Received: from modem-124.drummer.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.99.124] helo=lvm) by mail1.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.12 #0) id 125sw7-0002AN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:05:23 +0000 Message-ID: <000201bf5796$a8f4f540$7c63883e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Alan Melia Re QRS. Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:03:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Tks Alan for your info.I think I may have been listening with the Rx incorrectly tuned(BFO on the wrong side)but I have corrected this now so hope to see some sigs.The signal that went Digital is one that I see all the time on 137.679 at about S  2/3.However when it went digital the sig strength on one freq was S9+20!!! As you might imagine it completely messed up the 137.6 to 137.8 part of the band.I hope that this was an isolated case or as least infrequent .
Re AMRAD on 136.750 and your request,I have had a look and find 18 very strong lines between136.705 and 136.785.So far as measuring their frequencies there are some difficulties.I would like to drop you a line with my findings(print out etc) also settings of the equipment here so that you can comment and perhaps make suggestions.I have a 1994 call book which places you at Martlesham Heath,is this correct?
I will be very pleased to assist and of course very intrested.73s Laurie.