Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10617 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1999 23:42:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 212.159.2.35 with SMTP; 17 Dec 1999 23:42:59 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11z7RM-0006kQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 00:09:40 +0000 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11z7RL-0006kJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 00:09:39 +0000 Received: from [213.1.138.129] (helo=default) by rhenium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11z6wA-0006aE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 23:37:27 +0000 Message-ID: <000201bf48e7$5c13a5e0$818a01d5@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: re 162kHz field strength Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:47:39 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik's calculations would suggest that the 5 peaks and dips that I observed in the signal from CFH earlier in the year would be interference between 'different hop paths' ?? Going west to east I would confirm Andre's finding that the strongest signal peak is about (very 'about') half an hour before dawn at the eastern end of the path. The signal falls very steeply from this peak. I think Geri has a longer recording on his web site. Unfortunately CFH has been off air since a short burst of activity in September, and I have not found another identifyable reliable source to monitor yet. 73 de Alan G3NYK Alan.Melia@btinternet.com