Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16950 invoked from network); 28 Jul 1999 04:03:22 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 1999 04:03:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 13280 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 23:55:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 27 Jul 1999 23:55:08 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 119Gup-0005Mt-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:45:47 +0100 Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.48]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 119Guo-0005Mo-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:45:46 +0100 Received: from v3q4v1 (dc2-isdn1731.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.154.195]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA19339 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:45:44 +0200 (CEST) From: "M. Sanders" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Spectrogram query Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: <000201bed889$d2b5c6c0$c39a6dc2@v3q4v1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <000001bed859$60ca1d20$da1f883e@default> Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Dear John and Lowfers, Last weekend I was still using 5.01 but i have tried to look at Finbar, EI0CF's signal this morning and made a recording with 5.08. I used the same settings in 5.08 as in 5.01. There are some improvements in the new version but changing the settings dit not give better results. I could see a signal going slowly up and down a few Herz around 136.150, may be a VFO/TX but nothing audible (may be QRS CW ID for beacons is an improvement?). The Loran lines where perfectly visible as well as natural radio signalas running diagonally downward on the screen. DSP processing of the WAV recordings did not provide a positive ID on Finbar's call sign so I am still in the dark. The settings are listed on my site at: http://www.xs4all.nl/~misan/gram50+2.htm. By choosing colours in three bands the eye can separate the signals into10dB bands with 2.5dB brightness levels. This helps identifying signals. The general idea is to give stronger signals in a 10 dB band a lighter colour. The traditional rainbow spectrum and the shaded grey or blue spectrums represent exactly the same information but I look at it like fishing in a pond. The strong signals have red to yellow colours and can be compared to ducks floating on top of the water. The blue lines represent a relative signal bandwith -40 to -50dB. This band acts like the water surface. I adjust the gain so all Loran-C lines show as blue dotted lines with a few red dots in the peaks. The green bands are signals with a relative strenght -50 to -60 dB. When listening to a WAV file recording it is interesting to change the blue colours temporarily in to black. The reslult is like putting on sunglasses and then looking at the fishes down on the bottom of the pond without light reflections and ripples from the surface obscuring the sight. The spectogram on my site from DF3LP's signals show him to be a 'fat-duck' (his signal is audible 10dB or more above noise level!). Toni, HB9ASB's signals are slightly above the noise level. To show his call sign better in the picture the gain was increased and thus shifting the spectrum to red/yellow. When AGC is turned on the average level can be stabilised between light blue and vivid red. Loran-lines look now like thin and straight lines. When there is fading (QSB) wtihin de AGC range the signals do not change their colour making it easier to keep track one perticular signal. For DX 'fishing' and when listening close to strong signals no AGC should be used of course. Best 73's and good luck on LF, Michael Sanders, PA3BSH mailto:pa3bsh@amsat.org > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: majordom@post.thorcom.com [mailto:majordom@post.thorcom.com]namens > wireless > Verzonden: dinsdag 27 juli 1999 19:53 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: Spectrogram query > > > No one came back on my Spectrogram comment yesterday - does > anyone use 5.08 > and what settings have you found best for 10 sec dots? > > 73 > John Taylor G0AKN > earth@wireless.freeserve.co.uk > > > > >