Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5767 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23073 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 13:19:27 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14TOBw-0000K9-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:11:24 +0000 Received: from mail6.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.212]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14TOBv-0000K4-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:11:23 +0000 Received: from modem-240.eledhwen.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.182.240] helo=lvm) by mail6.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14TOBb-0005qc-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:11:04 +0000 Message-ID: <000101c09751$4b554b00$f0b6883e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Re. LF LDO>ZJ I personally dont think that there can be much doubt that this was a QSO,between LDO and ZJ, with ZJ having a remote Tx at ZZs location. If there had been a 250 mile(dist. ZZ to ZJ I belive) switch line between them, when John identified Peters message he would have pushed the transmit button! to reply. Since he did not have this land line he simply asked ZZ to push the button via an 80 m link,a pretty fine distinction in my opinion.What do you think ? 73s Laurie.