Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23335 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2001 11:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Jan 2001 11:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 16894 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2001 11:15:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 5 Jan 2001 11:15:44 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14EUl0-0005Cw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:10:02 +0000 Received: from cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.195.172]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14EUkz-0005CU-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:10:01 +0000 Received: from modem-49.belfalas.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.139.49] helo=lvm) by cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14EUkp-00039U-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:09:51 +0000 Message-ID: <000101c07708$83ec0260$318b883e@lvm> From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" To: "rsgb lf group" Subject: LF: Re. SXV and LF Tests Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:12:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: John does not think that he sees SXV,but the SXV data stream looks like noise here rather than discrete spectral lines! Can I suggest that the VE stations check the frequencies to see wether 135.670-135.780 is more noisy than the alternative band above 135.900. Obviously increased noise will reduce the possibilities of getting a signal across. I look foreward to us resolving this problem,Hi. 73s Laurie.