Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF7EF3800009F; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 05:19:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFiK3-0000QH-2L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:17:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFiK2-0000Q8-Gd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:17:54 +0100 Received: from mail-ey0-f171.google.com ([209.85.215.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFiK0-0002nY-Ia for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:17:53 +0100 Received: by eaah11 with SMTP id h11so2422091eaa.16 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:17:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :x-gm-message-state; bh=icfuBncRgGbKlBc/rXnUNsE73d+vgjkeT2TnaKKVIA4=; b=dseCRLPNnoH49FWlorAz0k+F8U3wv4KiNqpkX/fsyJGPAV3MQky/z6iwlf08w0PyMi ZtHjwsQcvYw+uUAik9hpckDW7vMj0ZIkNi5O+s3k1FWOkm1HigmU+xeDRUtlRyraVjf9 tsUqlK/vpb24X13MGDd99t5Vlr3U5gvIVk7Qbja9yJz01MgQufJ2FZyFHg6Uw9QRqJN6 +OU3jU/P9ktm3lga3ZBcRSSLfFfmz9wnZPLDxhRwfmwemfse97GGcN4ALQ7XdPVx2+eY 4yYhetM+IlOvH5iEabJu70yHuOvhPUk2L/qv/ZEN4QQSVZoM6idmks3WtNUGKGWg7+Cm IU2Q== Received: by 10.14.211.3 with SMTP id v3mr11208910eeo.43.1348391870972; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.211.3 with SMTP id v3mr11208902eeo.43.1348391870875; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Win7Pro (host86-132-15-36.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.15.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h42sm37159511eem.5.2012.09.23.02.17.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:17:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Terry GW0EZY To: References: <7F2208077DA448F78F384AF5B55DECA0@White> <505DD1D8.70901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <829FB31FADAD4D4682EC509D2416C9F4@AGB> <005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <0865DC8F-C867-4D80-8149-D2474B51ED63@gmail.com> <505E55F3.8020502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004d01cd9926$26739b50$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <6ECF47A4215C4DED9E68C3058165ACD5@White> In-Reply-To: <6ECF47A4215C4DED9E68C3058165ACD5@White> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:17:48 +0100 Message-ID: <000001cd996c$4d5fe3e0$e81faba0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2ZabPBFuhhbI7OQ3qgxHY6ZcLCuwAAZPEQ Content-Language: en-gb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcx3rscRMqRQ5tSie2JxB/W05R2vW7Mwa/3GVEKRAeLAF8gJr/hZaDpvrT4IAwDRcyTR/TmxkTthQ5TkUXrTzF+HO8+0n5SiyMTLyF/va8j9JbzPNa1f4wNLP0aItu1QINvbeCr7z57h1UtaJyU/UeChYSgYHrt67q1UlFpPijtiQG/AzOzySvD8vv/KNfk0IGyP9p X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the experiment! I finally managed to get it working with spots sent to WSPRnet with your correct frequency. Unfortunately, I see I am also decoding “normal” WSPR because both audio streams are seen by WSPR. Is it possible to separate? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.215.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: eb65b97b00a71049be1fa526941c7b31 Subject: RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01CD9974.AF244BE0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6089505ed40420b0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CD9974.AF244BE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Markus =20 Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the experiment! I finally = managed to get it working with spots sent to WSPRnet with your correct = frequency. Unfortunately, I see I am also decoding = =E2=80=9Cnormal=E2=80=9D WSPR because both audio streams are seen by = WSPR. Is it possible to separate? =20 As you have distributed the WSPR32 file I would like to try. Other than = running the bat is there any difference in the set-up? =20 =20 73 Terry =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus Vester Sent: 23 September 2012 09:53 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 =20 Thanks very much Jay, Terry and Chris for taking the effort to receive = and report our experiment, and of course to Stefan for suggesting it in = the first place. I think the expected gain in sensitivity is evident, = even though there is no "miracle machine" of course. I have now ended = the WSPR-8 transmission from Nuernberg for today.=20 =20 How would you like to proceed from here? Try WSPR-32 next? Perhaps a = slow WSPR experiment on MF? Or wait for Joe's 8-FSK mode JT8 which might = knock off another dB? =20 BTW I don't use a transverter for MF, but an FE-5680A Rubidium = synthesizer which can be controlled to generate WSPR directly. =20 Best wishes, and have a nice Sunday, Markus (DF6NM) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CD9974.AF244BE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Markus

 

Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the experiment! I = finally managed to get it working with spots sent to WSPRnet with your = correct frequency. Unfortunately, I see I am also decoding = =E2=80=9Cnormal=E2=80=9D WSPR because both audio streams are seen by = WSPR. Is it possible to separate?

 

As you have distributed the WSPR32 file I would like to try. Other = than running the bat is there any difference in the = set-up?

 

 

73 Terry

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus = Vester
Sent: 23 September 2012 09:53
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: = rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subject: Re: LF: Re: = Experimental software for WSPR-8 and = -32

 

Thanks very = much Jay, Terry and Chris for taking the effort to receive and = report our experiment, and of course to Stefan for suggesting it in = the first place. I think the expected gain in sensitivity is = evident, even though there is no "miracle = machine" of course. I have now ended the WSPR-8 transmission = from Nuernberg for today.

 

How would = you like to proceed from here? Try WSPR-32 next? Perhaps a slow WSPR = experiment on MF? Or wait for Joe's 8-FSK mode JT8 which might = knock off another dB?

 

BTW I don't = use a transverter for MF, but an FE-5680A Rubidium = synthesizer which can be controlled to generate WSPR = directly.

 

Best wishes, = and have a nice Sunday,

Markus = (DF6NM)

 

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CD9974.AF244BE0--