Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20496 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2005 14:01:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2005 14:01:29 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CqXQG-000LOY-Ci for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:00:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CqXQG-000LON-2N for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:00:00 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CqXRe-000Fy7-EH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:01:26 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CqXN9-0000Oy-Uw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:56:47 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CqXN9-0000Op-In for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:56:47 +0000 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqXN7-0000YC-5H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:56:47 +0000 Received: from altair ([147.197.200.45] helo=altair.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1CqXCL-0007a1-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:45:37 +0000 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by altair.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1CqXCL-0001Zd-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:45:37 +0000 From: "james moritz" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:45:33 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c4fc9a$d337d030$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000401c4fc74$c6c32460$141686d4@erica> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-From: j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 147.197.200.9 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of herts.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: RE: Re: Re: SWR-off topic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Dear Peter, LF Group, I just had a flick through "Electronic Applications of the Smith Chart" (1969) by Phillip H Smith in the university library - I suppose he ought to know about it... The first version of the Smith chart seems to have been published in 1936. In the introduction, Smith says it was "...intended only to assist in the solution of transmission line problems inherent in the design of directional shortwave antennas for Bell System applications of that period; its broader application was hardly envisioned at that time". This first chart was slightly different from the usual one in that the scales were modified to have a linear graduation in SWR, which was expressed as Vmin/Vmax, and so was between 0 and 1 instead of 1 and infinity. This distorts the shape of all the graduation lines, although it is still circular overall. But it shows that it was intended to use SWR measurements from the outset. The conventionally-shaped scales appear in the 1939 version, and the radial scales for reflection and transmission loss, etc appear in the 1944 version, which is more or less the current form. Smith puts the popularization of his chart down to its adoption by Radar workers at the MIT Radiation Lab during WW2. There are a bewildering array of modifications to the Smith chart, including expanded regions of low or high SWR, an inverted form with unity SWR at the outer edge of the chart (very odd scales on that one!) and versions for negative resistance (apparently useful for tunnel diode designs). Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU