Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: (qmail 71074 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2004 11:32:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3)
  by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Dec 2004 11:32:41 -0000
Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1ChR9e-000Ljc-J4
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:29:15 +0000
Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net)
	by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1ChR9e-000LjZ-Cg
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:29:14 +0000
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1ChRCx-000Ag9-Ks
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:32:39 +0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1ChRBt-0005pb-4e
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:33 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1ChRBs-0005pS-OI
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:32 +0000
Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9])
	by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1ChRBp-0001aS-6z
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:32 +0000
Received: from altair ([147.197.200.45] helo=altair.herts.ac.uk)
	by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
	id 1ChRBX-0001Gh-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:11 +0000
Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002)
	by altair.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 1ChRBW-0004Tz-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:10 +0000
From: "james moritz" <j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:31:09 -0000
Message-ID: <000001c4e8e2$e67b4df0$e6a4c593@RD40002>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <HKEKINMDBIDLPDGEIOBMIEKLCDAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected
X-UH-MailScanner-From: j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk
X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 147.197.200.9 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of herts.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DRASTIC_REDUCED=1.998
Subject: LF: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00)

Dear Gary, LF Group,

You need one without an air gap - the air gap will drastically reduce the
winding inductance, unfortunately. There is nothing magical about the LOPT
cores - I just used them because they were a suitable component available
for free! The original specified cores should also work fine with the same
number of turns. Try to keep the windings as compact as possible to minimise
the leakage inductance. 

In theory, you will get less loss if the strands of enamelled wire are
twisted together in small groups which are then twisted into bigger groups -
the idea being that each strand is on the outside of the bundle for an equal
fraction of the overall length, giving each strand an equal impedance and
making the current distribution more even. But in this case, the main reason
for doing it was because it is easier to wind a stranded wire than very
thick solid wire - the "litz" construction can't hurt though.

In my example of the G0MRF circuit, doing these mods led to increased power
output (about 400W @ 37V if I recall), while at the same time the improved
efficiency reduced the heating of the output transistors and output stage
components in general. If you have an oscilloscope, you should see a cleaner
waveform at the drains of the MOSFETs, although there will still be
considerable switching spikes present.

Good Luck with the mods,

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT
Sent: 22 December 2004 20:44
To: LF (Rsgb LF Group)
Cc: Jim Moritz (M0BMU)
Subject: LF: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx


Hi Jim & LF,

I am about to carry out the M0BMU current-fed mods for the G0MRF 300 watt
class D Tx.

I have salvaged several cores from monitor flyback/line O/P transformers &
they all have an air/di-electric gap on the round leg of the core. Is this
OK or should I search for one with no gap?