Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29838 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 17:42:21 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 22 May 2003 17:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11463 invoked by uid 10001); 22 May 2003 17:42:21 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 22 May 2003 17:42:21 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19ItzR-0008NV-AR for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 18:36:29 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.148] (helo=zinc) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19ItzI-0008NJ-Qx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 18:36:24 +0100 Received: from dial81-135-14-51.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.135.14.51] helo=acer5gi5q0ubzj) by zinc with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19Itz7-0006e0-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 18:36:09 +0100 From: "John W Gould" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 18:35:54 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c32088$9ed77fb0$330e8751@acer5gi5q0ubzj> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <157.1f871670.2bfca1a6@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: RE: LF: LF. 73kHz Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.0 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,IN_REP_TO,ORIGINAL_MESSAGEversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Message
I believe Dave's reply to be correct.
 
John, G3WKL
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of G0MRF@aol.com
Sent: 21 May 2003 10:32
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: LF. 73kHz

In a message dated 5/21/03 12:21:24 AM GMT Daylight Time, g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk writes:


The letter from the RA says that the NoV for 73kHz expires in June 2003. Is
that the 1st or the 30th of June?

Peter, G3LDO




I believe it's  23.59.59 on the 30th June

David   G0MRF